Akhirnya, mereka akan menyatakan Teoh telah membunuh diri atau jatuh silap sendiri ....

Pada pendapat saya, kebenaran tidak akan diketahui dalam inkues kematian Teoh Beng Hock...

Penyiasatan juga, kemungkinan besar, telah tidak dijalankan dengan serius untuk mengetahui kebenaran...atau mengetahui siapakah sebenar yang bertanggungjawab menyebabkan kematian Teoh Beng Hock...

Hakikat bahawa sehingga kini, pihak Pendakwaraya tidak pun mendakwa sesiapa pun adalah jelas menunjukkan bahawa penyiasatan polis sampai kepada jalan buntu... Ingin dinyatakan bahawa pihak pendakwaan tidak perlu menunggu habis inkues ini, atau Suruhanjaya di-Raja menyiasat untuk mendakwa seseorang untuk kesalahan membunuh Teoh Beng Hock...

Jika ada CCTV dengan keupayaan merakam ditempatkan di semua pelusuk MACC (SPRM), senang sekali kita mengetahui kebenaran....tetapi, di Malaysia, jika ada pun CCTV sedemikian, kita akan diberitahu CCTV rosak atau pita rakaman hilang...dan sebagainya..

Kini, kita diberitahu pula bahawa bukti menunjukkan bahawa Teoh mungkin telah membunuh diri...dengan lompat keluar daripada tingkap...

Tan had then asked Khairul on the possibility of Teoh committing suicide.

To this, Khairul agreed and said the "signs are more towards suicide".

And his reasons for this were:

1. There was no blood or any signs of broken things near the window at the 14^th floor. Also the pen was intact in Teoh's pocket, indicating that there was no struggle,

2. No DNA marks of any MACC officers on Teoh's body, and

3. Injuries on Teoh's body do not show any signs of struggle but were instead caused by falling from height. - Malaysiakini, 14/8/2009, Doc: Not homicide or accident, more a suicide

Kini, kita diberitahu bahawa Teoh munkin secara sengaja telah terjatuh keluar daripada tingkap semasa membukanya

Tan had then asked the doctor if he thought Teoh's death was accidental, based on his opinion formed after looking at Teoh's injuries and visits to the scene of the incident.

To this Khairul said that there were stronger and solid evidence to state that the deceased had an accident.

"This is based on the scene which is the 14th floor. It is difficult for someone who is still conscious to have slipped if he was standing beside the window because the floor is not slippery, it is covered with carpet.

"However, if we want to say that there is a possibility we can still contemplate that because it could have happen when the deceased tried to open the window to the widest and in a sleepy state," said Khairul.

However he added that this argument could be disputed because "if he slipped, the window shoulder which is at the height of his hips/ waist length, there is a possibility that the deceased fell by other ways".

"His head or body could have fallen first. This is just a possibility," he added. - Malaysiakini, 14/8/2009, Doc: Not homicide or accident, more a suicide

Melihat juga hakikat bahawa koroner yang mengendalikan inkues ini adalah hanya Tuan Majistret Azmil Muntapha Abas, di mana kredibiliti beliau juga diragui. Di depan dia adalah 'senior' beliau, dan oleh itu adakah beliau akan bercanggah dengan pendapat (atau 'arahan') senior beliau. Seorang Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi adalah lebih bebas, dan boleh diharapkan berbanding dengan seorang daripada 'Judicial and Legal Services Commission', di mana Peguam Negara adalah juga bos.

Sebelum ini, Azmil Muntapha Abas adalah Timbalan Pendaftar Mahkamah Tinggi - kini Majistret, dan tahu depan beliau mungkin jadi DPP...dan kemudian mungkin juga dilantik jadi Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen....

Adakah dia yang menjadi koroner dapat membuat keputusan yang wajar dan adil? Dapatkah dia bertindak saperti seorang koroner yang benar-benar mahukan kebenaran? Atau adakah keputusan dan cara dia menjalankan inkues ini dipengaruhi dengan pemikiran mengenai masa depan beliau sendiri...